{"id":2475,"date":"2019-03-20T12:26:03","date_gmt":"2019-03-20T12:26:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bear-hearing.dk\/?page_id=2475"},"modified":"2019-11-01T13:59:43","modified_gmt":"2019-11-01T13:59:43","slug":"palle-rye-who-we-are","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/bear-hearing.dk\/da\/whoweare\/palle-rye-who-we-are\/","title":{"rendered":"Palle Rye \u2013 Hvem vi er"},"content":{"rendered":"

Hvem vi er<\/h3>\t\t\t
Projektet havde deltagelse af en gruppe dedikerede mennesker, der kom fra audiologiske klinikker, universiteter, teknologisk service, og h\u00f8reapparatindustrien. Det var medicinske audiologer og otologer, ingeni\u00f8rer, konsulenter og audiologop\u00e6der. Nogle unge, andre mere erfarne. Nogle arbejdede p\u00e5 projektet p\u00e5 fuld tid, andre p\u00e5 deltid og med andre forpligtelser. Enkelte havde direkte erfaringer med h\u00f8reneds\u00e6ttelse og rehabilitering.<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div><\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n\n
\n\t\"Mengfan\n<\/a><\/div>\n\n<\/div><\/div><\/div>
\n
\n\t

Palle Rye<\/b><\/a><\/div>\r\nPhD studerende\r\nAalborg Universitet<\/h4>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Palle Rye<\/h3>\n
\n\t

\nPalle Rye er civilingeni\u00f8r i elektronisk system konstruktion med speciale i akustik fra 1998. I 10 \u00e5r arbejdede han som akustik ingeni\u00f8r i mobil industrien, hvor han var involveret i udviklingen af mere end 20 forskellige mobil telefoner, i alt i mere end 20 millioner solgte enheder. Hans opgaver omfattede innovation, analyse og optimere af komplekse akustiske systemer, fra koncept til implementation til typegodkendelse og produktion. Han har ogs\u00e5 en dyb erfaring med implementation og tilpasning af digital signal behandling til undertrykkelse af baggrundsst\u00f8j og ekko eller anden forbedring af tale og musik. Indtil 2018 underviste han i fysik, teknologi og elektronik ved teknisk gymnasium, kontinuerligt udviklende hands-on projekter og inddragende ingeni\u00f8r redskaber og praksis ind i klassev\u00e6relset.<\/p><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Arbejdsomr\u00e5de<\/h3>\n
\n\t

Palle Rye arbejder prim\u00e6rt med bruger-styret tilpasning<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>

Ressourcer<\/h3>\n
\n\t<\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>
\n
\n\t

Publikationer<\/h4>\n
<\/a><\/form>\r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n

2023<\/h3>\r\n <\/td>\r\n <\/tr>

Narayanan, Sreeram Kaithali; Rye, Palle; Houm\u00f8ller, Sabina Storbjerg; Wolff, Anne; Hougaard, Dan Dupont; Gaihede, Michael; Hammersh\u00f8i, Dorte<\/p>

Difference in SII provided by initial fit and NAL-NL2 and its relation to self-reported hearing aid outcomes<\/a> Journal Article<\/span> <\/p>

International Journal of Audiology, <\/span>pp. 1-8, <\/span>2023<\/span>.<\/p>

Abstract<\/a><\/span> | Links<\/a><\/span> | BibTeX<\/a><\/span><\/p>

@article{SKN_SII,
\r\ntitle = {Difference in SII provided by initial fit and NAL-NL2 and its relation to self-reported hearing aid outcomes},
\r\nauthor = {Sreeram Kaithali Narayanan and Palle Rye and Sabina Storbjerg Houm\u00f8ller and Anne Wolff and Dan Dupont Hougaard and Michael Gaihede and Dorte Hammersh\u00f8i},
\r\ndoi = {10.1080\/14992027.2023.2291633},
\r\nyear = {2023},
\r\ndate = {2023-12-19},
\r\njournal = {International Journal of Audiology},
\r\npages = {1-8},
\r\nabstract = {Objective
\r\nThe speech intelligibility index (SII) is used to quantify the audibility of the speech. This study examined the relationship between self-reported hearing aid (HA) outcomes and the difference in aided SII (SIIA) calculated from the initial fit (IF) gain and that prescribed as per the second generation of National Acoustic Laboratory Non-Linear (NAL-NL2).
\r\n
\r\nDesign
\r\nA prospective observational study.
\r\n
\r\nStudy sample
\r\nThe study included 718 first-time and 253 experienced HA users. All users had a valid real-ear measurement (REM) at three input levels (55, 65 and 80\u2009dB SPL).
\r\n
\r\nResults
\r\nThe gain provided by IF was lower than NAL-NL2 at 55 and 65\u2009dB SPL. IF gain exhibited reduced compression than NAL-NL2 as input levels increased from 55 to 80\u2009dB SPL. On average, the SIIA provided by IF was significantly lower than that for NAL-NL2 at all input levels. The difference in SIIA between IF and NAL-NL2 at 80\u2009dB SPL input level with 0\u2009dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) turned out to be a predictor for self-reported outcome for first-time HA users.
\r\n
\r\nConclusion
\r\nThe study suggests that an SIIA close to that provided by NAL-NL2 at high input levels would be preferred to obtain a better self-reported outcome.\u2003},
\r\nkeywords = {},
\r\npubstate = {published},
\r\ntppubtype = {article}
\r\n}
\r\n<\/div>

Close<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\r\n

2022<\/h3>\r\n <\/td>\r\n <\/tr>

Rye, Palle; Andersen, Rasmus Overgaard; Ravn, Gert; Hammersh\u00f8i, Dorte<\/p>

Comparison of Speech Reception Thresholds for Diotic, Dichotic and Antiphasic Headphone Presentations of Digits-in-Noise Triplets using Dantale I Material<\/a> Inproceedings<\/span> <\/p>

Oral presentation at the Joint Euroregio Baltic Nordic Acoustics Meeting, Aalborg, Denmark, <\/span>2022<\/span>.<\/p>

Links<\/a><\/span> | BibTeX<\/a><\/span><\/p>

Narayanan, Sreeram Kaithali; Rye, Palle; Piechowiak, Tobias; Ravn, Gert; Wolff, Anne; Houm\u00f8ller, Sabina Storbjerg; Schmidt, Jesper Hvass; Hammersh\u00f8i, Dorte<\/p>

Can real-ear insertion gain deviations from generic fitting prescriptions predict self-reported outcomes?<\/a> Journal Article<\/span> <\/p>

The International Journal of Audiology, <\/span>62 <\/span>(5), <\/span>pp. 433-441, <\/span>2022<\/span>.<\/p>

Abstract<\/a><\/span> | Links<\/a><\/span> | BibTeX<\/a><\/span><\/p>

@article{TIJA_SKN_J1,
\r\ntitle = {Can real-ear insertion gain deviations from generic fitting prescriptions predict self-reported outcomes?},
\r\nauthor = {Sreeram Kaithali Narayanan and Palle Rye and Tobias Piechowiak and Gert Ravn and Anne Wolff and Sabina Storbjerg Houm\u00f8ller and Jesper Hvass Schmidt and Dorte Hammersh\u00f8i},
\r\nurl = {https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14992027.2022.2053594},
\r\ndoi = {10.1080\/14992027.2022.2053594},
\r\nyear = {2022},
\r\ndate = {2022-04-07},
\r\njournal = {The International Journal of Audiology},
\r\nvolume = {62},
\r\nnumber = {5},
\r\npages = {433-441},
\r\nabstract = {Objective
\r\nThe aim of this study was to determine whether the differences in insertion gains from the first fit to generic prescriptions of hearing aids can predict the self-reported hearing aid (HA) outcomes for first-time and experienced HA users.
\r\n
\r\nDesign
\r\nThis was a prospective observational study.
\r\n
\r\nStudy Sample
\r\nThe study included 885 first-time and 330 experienced HA users with a valid real-ear measurement on both ears and answers to the abbreviated version of the Speech, Spatial, and Quality of Hearing (SSQ12) and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) questionnaires.
\r\n
\r\nResults
\r\nK-means clustering of gain differences between individual real-ear insertion gain to three generic gain prescriptions (NAL-NL2, NAL-RP, and one-third gain rules) was performed. The gain difference at higher frequencies generally differentiated the clusters. The experienced users in the cluster with fittings closest to NAL-NL2 and NAL-RP prescription were found to exhibit a higher IOI-HA Factor 1 score (representing the overall benefit of the hearing aid use). The gain differences to generic prescription did not affect other self-reported outcomes for first-time and experienced HA users.
\r\n
\r\nConclusion
\r\nThe experienced HA users with minimal gain deviations from generic prescriptions reported better self-perceived benefits than users with larger deviations. However, this was not apparent in first-time users.},
\r\nkeywords = {},
\r\npubstate = {published},
\r\ntppubtype = {article}
\r\n}
\r\n<\/div>

Close<\/a><\/p><\/div>

Objective
\r\nThe aim of this study was to determine whether the differences in insertion gains from the first fit to generic prescriptions of hearing aids can predict the self-reported hearing aid (HA) outcomes for first-time and experienced HA users.
\r\n
\r\nDesign
\r\nThis was a prospective observational study.
\r\n
\r\nStudy Sample
\r\nThe study included 885 first-time and 330 experienced HA users with a valid real-ear measurement on both ears and answers to the abbreviated version of the Speech, Spatial, and Quality of Hearing (SSQ12) and the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) questionnaires.
\r\n
\r\nResults
\r\nK-means clustering of gain differences between individual real-ear insertion gain to three generic gain prescriptions (NAL-NL2, NAL-RP, and one-third gain rules) was performed. The gain difference at higher frequencies generally differentiated the clusters. The experienced users in the cluster with fittings closest to NAL-NL2 and NAL-RP prescription were found to exhibit a higher IOI-HA Factor 1 score (representing the overall benefit of the hearing aid use). The gain differences to generic prescription did not affect other self-reported outcomes for first-time and experienced HA users.
\r\n
\r\nConclusion
\r\nThe experienced HA users with minimal gain deviations from generic prescriptions reported better self-perceived benefits than users with larger deviations. However, this was not apparent in first-time users.<\/div>

Close<\/a><\/p><\/div>

\r\n

2021<\/h3>\r\n <\/td>\r\n <\/tr>

Rye, Palle; Narayanan, Sreeram Kaithali; Hammersh\u00f8i, Dorte<\/p>

Effects of Intermittent Noise on Real Ear Measurements in Hearing Aid Fitting<\/a> Inproceedings<\/span> <\/p>

Poster presentation at Baltic Nordic Acoustics Meeting, 3-5 May 2021, Oslo, Norway (online), <\/span>pp. 1\u20136, <\/span>NAA (Nordic Acoustical Association), <\/span>2021<\/span>.<\/p>

Abstract<\/a><\/span> | Links<\/a><\/span> | BibTeX<\/a><\/span><\/p>

@inproceedings{PR_BNAM2021,
\r\ntitle = {Effects of Intermittent Noise on Real Ear Measurements in Hearing Aid Fitting},
\r\nauthor = {Palle Rye and Sreeram Kaithali Narayanan and Dorte Hammersh\u00f8i},
\r\nurl = {http:\/\/www.norskakustiskselskap.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/BNAM_2021_Effects_of_Intermittent_Noise_on_Real_Ear_Measurements_in_Hearing_Aid_Fitting-31-28-Rye-Palle.pdf},
\r\nyear = {2021},
\r\ndate = {2021-05-03},
\r\nbooktitle = {Poster presentation at Baltic Nordic Acoustics Meeting, 3-5 May 2021, Oslo, Norway (online)},
\r\npages = {1--6},
\r\npublisher = {NAA (Nordic Acoustical Association)},
\r\nabstract = {When fitting a hearing aid, real ear measurements (REM) can prove a valuable tool for adjusting the gain of the hearing aid. In REM a probe microphone is inserted into the ear canal carefully placing the probe microphone tip a few millimeters from the tympanic membrane. Typically a reference microphone is present outside the ear canal near the pinna. Proper calibration before the REM measurement ensures a flat response of the probe microphone when placing the tip at the same positions as the reference microphone.
\r\nThe real ear unaided gain (REUG) is measured as the level difference between the reference microphone and the probe microphone placed near the tympanic membrane. Inserting the hearing aid the real ear aided gain (REAG) can be measured similarly and the real ear insertion gain (REIG) is calculated as the difference between the REAG and the REUG. Fitting a hearing aid typically involves matching the hearing aid gain to match a REIG prescription target derived by the patients audiogram and occasionally other diagnostic data. To ensure matching the REIG to the prescription target care must be taken to ensure accuracy in the REM measurements.
\r\nInspecting a database of thousands of clinically recorded REM a handful of anomalies were detected and the present study seek to reproduce the observed effects under controlled laboratory conditions. The study involves measuring REM using manikins as well as human subjects. A semi-automated test setup was developed to synchronise the measurement equipment and the noise disturbance in order to investigate the effects of different types of intermittent noise on REM. Preliminary results indicate that intermittent noise burst even shorter than 1s in duration can cause detrimental effects on the real ear measurement.},
\r\nkeywords = {},
\r\npubstate = {published},
\r\ntppubtype = {inproceedings}
\r\n}
\r\n<\/div>

Close<\/a><\/p><\/div>

When fitting a hearing aid, real ear measurements (REM) can prove a valuable tool for adjusting the gain of the hearing aid. In REM a probe microphone is inserted into the ear canal carefully placing the probe microphone tip a few millimeters from the tympanic membrane. Typically a reference microphone is present outside the ear canal near the pinna. Proper calibration before the REM measurement ensures a flat response of the probe microphone when placing the tip at the same positions as the reference microphone.
\r\nThe real ear unaided gain (REUG) is measured as the level difference between the reference microphone and the probe microphone placed near the tympanic membrane. Inserting the hearing aid the real ear aided gain (REAG) can be measured similarly and the real ear insertion gain (REIG) is calculated as the difference between the REAG and the REUG. Fitting a hearing aid typically involves matching the hearing aid gain to match a REIG prescription target derived by the patients audiogram and occasionally other diagnostic data. To ensure matching the REIG to the prescription target care must be taken to ensure accuracy in the REM measurements.
\r\nInspecting a database of thousands of clinically recorded REM a handful of anomalies were detected and the present study seek to reproduce the observed effects under controlled laboratory conditions. The study involves measuring REM using manikins as well as human subjects. A semi-automated test setup was developed to synchronise the measurement equipment and the noise disturbance in order to investigate the effects of different types of intermittent noise on REM. Preliminary results indicate that intermittent noise burst even shorter than 1s in duration can cause detrimental effects on the real ear measurement.<\/div>

Close<\/a><\/p><\/div>